The Northwest Passage, the Arctic and Canada’s claim to it, and finally, Billy Connolly takes you on a tour of the north- [do not miss it]

March 19, 2009 Conservative Reporter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Canada’s Legal Claims over Arctic Territory and Waters – This is a December, 2007 document – [ expect this to be amended ]

This blog had an article on this subject June, 2007 for your further information.

August, 2007 – Our Prime Minister asserts our claim to the Northwest Passage

Canada Claims Sovereignty in the Arctic

August 28, 2008–TUKTOYAKTUK, Northwest Territories – Canada’s prime minister moved to firm up control of disputed Arctic waters Wednesday by announcing stricter registration requirements for ships sailing in the Northwest Passage.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said that all ships sailing into the Canadian Arctic will be required to report to NORDREG, the Canadian Coast Guard agency that tracks vessels on such journeys. Such registration is now voluntary.

October 20, 2007 – Treading on Thin Ice -

Inside a high-security facility in southern England this week, two Canadian officers scribbled notes as they learned how to spot Russian submarines by listening to faint sounds reflected off the floor of the Arctic Ocean.

Later, they would spend hours memorizing the intricate and nearly silent audio patterns made by the latest generation of Russian and U.S. submarines, highly classified knowledge that will be used by Canada to follow the increasingly assertive manoeuvres taking place beneath the Arctic ice.

“It’s become a real cat-and-mouse game, actually, submarines keep trying to improve their noise-quieting technology, and we try to improve our listening technology to stay ahead. It’s a constant challenge,” said Captain Glen Gullison, from the Canadian military’s Acoustic Data Analysis Centre in Halifax.

Use It or Lose It –

Mr Harper said a cold-weather army training base would be set up at Resolute Bay and an existing port at a former mine at Nanisivik would be refurbished to supply Arctic patrol vessels.

_44049967_harper_ap203

Battle for Arctic Heats Up

The Arctic is under siege as never before.

The Russians send submarines deep below the North Pole. The Americans dispatch surveillance planes to monitor new threats in the North. And when high-profile visitors such as U.S. President Barack Obama come to town, Canada scrambles to defend territories it has ignored for too long.

resolute-bay-cp-w5169533


Military scrambled over foreign sub sighting = Forces tried to keep August sighting, explosion in High Arctic under wraps

Rob Huebert, associate director of the University of Calgary’s Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, sub_arctic said it’s possible U.S., British, Russian or even French subs could have been operating in the area. “Nobody wants to face up to the fact that in the Arctic we’re starting to see everybody resuming naval operations again.” - Last summer, Russia announced plans to increase the “operational radius” of its northern sub fleet.

Battle for the Arctic heats up – countries rush to plant their flags in the vast arctic

By Sandro Contenta , GlobalPost
Published: March 17, 2009 22:00 ET
Updated: March 18, 2009 23:23 ET

TORONTO — For Canadians, the Arctic has long been a place of imagination. It’s where Inuit shamans fly and explorers disappear without a trace. Vast and forbidding, it has helped imprint in the national psyche an almost debilitating sense of isolation.

Canada’s sovereignty over its portion of this mythical place is now being challenged, most notably by the United States and Russia. It’s part of a bigger rush for the Arctic, the setting for what the conservative Heritage Foundation recently predicted will be a new Cold War.

A British film crew sail through the Northwest Passage

[Editor's note: Stephen Harper stood ground against the U.S in his first news conference as prime minister-elect. At issue: Harper's vow to deploy military icebreakers to monitor and defend our northern arctic waters. The day before, U.S. ambassador to Canada David Wilkins had opposed the plan, stating, "There's no reason to create a problem that doesn't exist." Harper's response on Friday: "The United States defends its sovereignty and the Canadian government will defend our sovereignty. It is the Canadian people we get our mandate from, not the ambassador of the United States."

At stake is control over the long sought Northwest Passage route over Canada's northern reaches, fast becoming a reality thanks to global warming. To understand the significance of such a passage, and Canada's interests there, the Tyee presents this in-depth article by UBC international law expert Michael Byers. This article is adapted from a speech he gave to The Vancouver Institute on January 28.]


The Need to Defend our Northwest Passage


AND TO FINALIZE…HERE IS A TREAT – BILLY CONNOLLY – JOURNEY TO THE EDGE OF THE WORLD -

Here it is in no particular order:

And Here:

Here:

Finally Here:

Entry Filed under: canadian politics

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. wilson  |  March 20, 2009 at 12:07 am

    Excellent post CP! Thx.

  • 2. Conservative Reporter  |  March 20, 2009 at 7:36 am

    I am putting in a comment from Mark, Ottawa – his post got lost when I did some re-writing of the original post:

    Letter of mine in the Toronto Star, March 14 (links after first added by me):

    Re: Staking our Arctic claim, Editorial March 13

    I fear your editorial has fallen victim to the efforts of the Conservative government to stoke jingoistic “use it or lose it” fervour over our supposedly threatened “Arctic sovereignty.” You write that “… we should aim to project a credible military presence in the Far North …” But no one except the Danes (Hans Island) has any claim on any Canadian land in the North.

    Foreign countries are about as likely to invade the North as they are to invade Newfoundland.

    As the editorial notes, the only areas in dispute are at sea: the status in maritime law of the Northwest Passage; the maritime boundary in the Beaufort Sea between the U.S. and Canada; and the economic rights to the Arctic seabed in offshore areas beyond various countries’ coastal 320-kilometre exclusive economic zones.

    I agree that “Gunboats alone can’t guarantee Canada’s claim to the Arctic.” In fact, naval power is essentially irrelevant to the resolution of those issues. They will in the end be settled by diplomacy – not unnecessary new Arctic patrol vessels for the Canadian Navy.

    To the extent that a governmental marine presence might help our legal claim to the Northwest Passage, Canadian Coast Guard icebreakers would be more than adequate.

    Mark Collins, Ottawa

    The Star left out the last sentence I sent:

    The current fleet of six heavy and medium icebreakers is old and badly in need of renewal; the government should be planning several more new ones rather than the single ship, the so-called “Diefenbreaker”, that it has said it will acquire–by 2017!

    Mark
    Ottawa


Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden



Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to comments via RSS Feed

Blog Stats

Recent Comments

His_wife59 on Even a National Post article b…
Sobontofsseta on This was an excellent posting …
MaryT on MP Paul Szabo still wants to s…
Sandy on MP Paul Szabo still wants to s…
Alice Thompson on This was an excellent posting …
MaryT on The Media is doing their best …
Jen on The Media is doing their best …
Jen on The Media is doing their best …
conservative reporte… on The Media is doing their best …
gimbol on The Media is doing their best …
wilson on The Media is doing their best …
Mary Hines on The Media is doing their best …
wilson on The Media is doing their best …
Bec on The Media is doing their best …
Jen on The Media is doing their best …

Top Posts

Archives

Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.